Fired After a Background Check: Your FCRA Rights
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced West Virginia attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Managing Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed January 1, 2026
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I got fired from my job because of my background.
Attorney Answer
Being fired over your criminal record is usually legal. How your employer handled the background report may not have been — and that, not the firing itself, is where any claim you have lives.
The governing law
Federal law imposes two separate obligations on an employer that uses a background report, and employers skip the first one constantly.
Before acting. Under 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(b)(3), before taking adverse action based in whole or in part on a consumer report obtained for employment purposes, the employer must give you a copy of the report and a written description of your rights under the FCRA. This has to come before the adverse action, so that you have an opportunity to dispute inaccuracies before the decision takes effect. If your employer pulled a report and fired you the same day without ever handing you a copy, that is the violation to look at.
After acting. Under 15 U.S.C. § 1681m(a), after taking adverse action based in whole or in part on a consumer report, the employer must notify you of the adverse action and provide the name, address, and telephone number of the consumer reporting agency that furnished the report, together with notice of your right to obtain a free copy of the report and to dispute its accuracy.
What the cases add — including the parts that hurt
In Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Burr, 551 U.S. 47 (2007), the Supreme Court held that "willfully fails to comply" in the FCRA's civil liability provision, 15 U.S.C. § 1681n(a), reaches reckless violations as well as knowing ones, so a defendant need not have acted knowingly to face statutory and punitive damages. But the Court set a demanding standard for recklessness at the same time: a company does not act recklessly if its reading of the statute, though ultimately wrong, was objectively reasonable and no authoritative guidance or circuit precedent had warned it away from that reading. Both defendants in that case escaped willfulness liability on exactly that basis. A merely negligent violation supports only actual damages under § 1681o. In plain terms: proving the violation is one thing, proving it was willful — which is what unlocks statutory and punitive damages — is much harder.
Dalton v. Capital Associated Industries, Inc., 257 F.3d 409 (4th Cir. 2001) is about the background-check company rather than the employer, and it only matters to you if your report was wrong. There, a reporting agency inaccurately reported a criminal conviction to a prospective employer and the applicant lost the job. The Fourth Circuit held that summary judgment for the agency was error: a jury could find it negligently violated § 1681e(b), by failing to follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy, and § 1681k, by failing to maintain strict procedures for public-record information reported for employment purposes where it did not notify the consumer at the time of transmittal. But the court also affirmed that no reasonable jury could find the violation willful on those facts, limiting the consumer to actual damages. The FCRA imposes no strict liability for reporting inaccuracies.
So be honest with yourself about the threshold question: was the report accurate? You have said only that you were fired "because of my background," not that the report was wrong. If the record it showed was correct and the employer gave you both notices, you likely have no FCRA claim, and West Virginia's at-will rule means an employer may generally act on an accurate record.
If you believe your record was used as a pretext for discrimination based on a protected characteristic, that is a separate claim with its own, much shorter administrative deadline, and you should raise it promptly with a lawyer.
What you can do
1. Ask your former employer in writing for the name of the company that ran the check and a copy of the report they relied on. § 1681m(a) requires them to give you the agency's name, address, and telephone number. 2. Request your file directly from the reporting agency. After an adverse action you are entitled to a free copy. 3. Read the report line by line. Look for charges that were dismissed, records that were expunged, entries belonging to someone with a similar name, wrong dispositions, and wrong dates. 4. Lay out the dates side by side: the date the report was pulled, the date you were given a copy if ever, and the date you were fired. That sequence is what shows whether the pre-adverse-action step required by § 1681b(b)(3) was skipped. 5. Save every text, email, and letter about the termination, including the message telling you that you were let go. 6. If the report contains errors, dispute them in writing with the reporting agency and keep proof of the dispute. That paper trail is what a Dalton-type claim against the agency is built on. 7. Take both tracks to a consumer lawyer — the employer for the notice failures, and the agency if the report was inaccurate — and ask realistically about damages, given the Safeco willfulness standard.
⏱ Time limits apply. FCRA claims carry their own filing period, and any discrimination charge you might also want to file runs on a much shorter administrative clock that starts on the date of your termination. When your clocks started depends on the dates on your report and your termination letter.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Burr, 551 U.S. 47 (2007) — Supreme Court of the United States
'Willfully fails to comply' in FCRA's civil liability provision, 15 U.S.C. § 1681n(a), reaches reckless violations as well as knowing ones, so a defendant need not have acted knowingly to be exposed to statutory and punitive damages. But the Court simultaneously set a demanding standard for recklessness: a company does not act recklessly if its reading of the statute, though ultimately wrong, was 'objectively reasonable' and no authoritative guidance or circuit precedent had warned it away from that reading. On that basis both defendants escaped willfulness liability. A merely negligent violation supports only actual damages under § 1681o. - Dalton v. Capital Associated Industries, Inc., 257 F.3d 409 (4th Cir. 2001) — United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Concerns the duties of the CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCY, not the employer. Where a background-check company inaccurately reported a criminal conviction to a prospective employer and the applicant lost the job, the Fourth Circuit held that summary judgment for the agency was error: a jury could find the agency negligently violated § 1681e(b) (failure to follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy) and § 1681k (failure to maintain strict procedures for public-record information reported for employment purposes, where the agency did not notify the consumer at the time of transmittal). The court simultaneously AFFIRMED that no reasonable jury could find the violation willful on those facts, so the consumer was limited to actual damages under § 1681o. FCRA imposes no strict liability for reporting inaccuracies.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in West Virginia
- File or look up a case through the West Virginia Judiciary.
- Get free civil legal help from Legal Aid of West Virginia.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an employer legally fire me for something in my criminal record?
Generally yes. West Virginia employment is at-will, and an accurate criminal record is usually a lawful basis to act on. What federal law regulates is the process: § 1681b(b)(3) requires a copy of the report and a written statement of your FCRA rights before the adverse action, and § 1681m(a) requires notice with the reporting agency's contact information afterward. The claim, if there is one, is about those steps.
What if the background report was accurate?
Then a claim against the reporting agency for inaccuracy is off the table — Dalton was a case about an inaccurate report, and the FCRA imposes no strict liability for reporting. But an employer that never gave you the pre-adverse-action copy required by § 1681b(b)(3), or the post-action notice required by § 1681m(a), may still have violated the statute even if everything in the report was true.
How much money could a claim like this be worth?
Be cautious here. Under Safeco, a merely negligent violation supports only actual damages under § 1681o; statutory and punitive damages require willfulness, and the Court set a demanding standard — an objectively reasonable but wrong reading of the statute is not reckless. In Dalton itself the Fourth Circuit held no reasonable jury could find willfulness and limited the consumer to actual damages. Ask a consumer lawyer to assess your specific facts before forming expectations.