Repeated Eviction From a Rental With Habitability Defects
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced West Virginia attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Managing Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed January 1, 2026
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I rented got evicted came back to same residence evicted again but my house has no running water cause of issues noth times. I havent had working bathroom or kitchen mold in house so he took out cabinets still havent replaced them. Do I have caselines.
Attorney Answer
You may have a claim for money damages — but because you have already been evicted, the habitability defense that could have kept you in the home is no longer available to you for evictions that are finished.
West Virginia does require what you were not getting. W. Va. Code § 37-6-30 obligates a residential landlord to "at the commencement of a tenancy, deliver the dwelling unit and surrounding premises in a fit and habitable condition, and shall thereafter maintain the leased property in such condition"; to "maintain the leased property in a condition that meets requirements of applicable health, safety, fire and housing codes"; to "maintain in good and safe working order and condition all electrical, plumbing, sanitary, heating, ventilating, air-conditioning and other facilities"; and to "supply running water and reasonable amounts of hot water at all times, and reasonable heat between October 1, and the last day of April." No running water and no working bathroom or kitchen go straight to the plumbing and running-water duties. Mold implicates the health and housing code duty. Missing kitchen cabinets that were removed and never replaced go to the maintenance duty.
Those duties are enforceable in court. In Teller v. McCoy, 162 W. Va. 367, 253 S.E.2d 114 (W. Va. 1978), the Supreme Court of Appeals adopted the implied warranty of habitability in residential leases and treated the lease covenants as mutually dependent, holding that breach of the implied warranty is a material covenant on which the duty to pay rent depends and may be raised as a defense in a landlord's action for rent, and expressly holding that it is a defense to an action for unlawful detainer. Damages are measured by the difference between the fair market value of the premises as warranted and the fair rental value of the premises as they actually were during your occupancy, and you may additionally recover damages for annoyance and inconvenience proven to have resulted from the breach.
But read the limits, because they are the part that decides real cases. The breach must be of a substantial nature rendering the premises uninhabitable and unfit — minor code violations do not entitle a tenant to a rent reduction. You must have given the landlord notice of any defect he did not already know about. A landlord is not liable for a defect caused by the tenant's own wrongful conduct. West Virginia does not allow repair-and-deduct. And where only part of the rent obligation is suspended, the tenant must be given the chance to pay the balance or judgment goes to the landlord.
On timing, Jaroush v. Cook, 170 W. Va. 714, 296 S.E.2d 544 (W. Va. 1982), applied Teller in the eviction posture: where a landlord bases the right to repossess on nonpayment and the tenant defends by alleging breach of the implied warranty, the tenant must not be immediately dispossessed but must be given an opportunity to prove the allegations; if the breach is proved, the tenant may elect to retain possession, and if it is not, he can be dispossessed. That is a defense in a pending case. It does not reverse an eviction that has already happened. What remains for you is an affirmative damages claim under Teller and § 37-6-30 — and, if a case is still pending or an appeal window is open, the defense itself.
What you can do
1. Find out whether either eviction case is still open or still within an appeal period. Call the magistrate court clerk and ask for the status of each case. This is the first call to make, because the answer changes what is possible. 2. Gather your proof of the conditions: photos and videos with dates, the removed cabinets, the mold, the non-working bathroom and kitchen. 3. Find your notice to the landlord — texts, emails, letters, or the maintenance requests you made. Under Teller, notice of defects he did not already know about is required, so this evidence is essential. 4. Get any inspection or code enforcement records. Contact the local health or code enforcement office and ask whether the unit was ever cited. 5. Add up what you paid in rent for each period the unit lacked running water and a working bathroom or kitchen. That total is the basis of the damages measure Teller sets. 6. Take all of it to a legal aid office or a landlord-tenant lawyer. Ask specifically about an affirmative claim for the difference between the rent you paid and what the place was actually worth, plus annoyance and inconvenience.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Teller v. McCoy, 162 W. Va. 367, 253 S.E.2d 114 (W. Va. 1978) — Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
Teller v. McCoy is the decision that adopted the implied warranty of habitability in West Virginia residential leases and treated lease covenants as mutually dependent rather than independent. Answering certified questions, the Court held that 'breach by the landlord of the implied warranty of habitability, a material covenant upon which the duty to pay rent depends, may be raised as a defense in a landlord's action for rent,' and expressly held 'that breach of the implied warranty is a defense to an action for unlawful detainer.' Damages for breach 'are measured by the difference between the fair market value of the premises if they had been as warranted and the fair rental value of the premises as they were during the occupancy by the tenant in the unsafe and unsanitary condition,' and the tenant 'may additionally recover damages for annoyance and inconvenience proven to have resulted from the breach.' The Court also set the limits: the breach 'must be of a substantial nature rendering the premises uninhabitable and unfit,' so minor code violations do not entitle the tenant to a rent reduction; the tenant 'is under an obligation to give landlord notice of a deficiency or defect not known to the latter'; a landlord is not liable for a defect caused by the tenant's own wrongful conduct; the Court declined to adopt a 'repair and deduct' remedy; and where only part of the rent obligation is suspended, the tenant must be given an opportunity to pay the balance or judgment will be entered for the landlord. - Jaroush v. Cook, 170 W. Va. 714, 296 S.E.2d 544 (W. Va. 1982) — Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
Jaroush v. Cook confirms and applies Teller in the eviction posture: 'where a landlord predicates his right to repossess the premises on the tenant's failure to pay rent and the tenant as a defense alleges that the landlord has breached the implied warranty of habitability, then the tenant must not be immediately dispossessed, but must be afforded an opportunity to prove his allegations.' And: 'If the tenant proves that the implied warranty has been breached, that proof constitutes a defense allowing him, on his election, to retain possession of the premises. If he fails to prove the breach, he can then be dispossessed.' This is a defense available to a tenant IN a pending eviction proceeding. It does not undo an eviction that has already occurred — a tenant who has already been evicted would be looking instead at an affirmative damages claim for breach of the warranty under Teller and W. Va. Code § 37-6-30, and, if a case is still pending or an appeal window is open, at raising the defense there.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in West Virginia
- File or look up a case through the West Virginia Judiciary.
- Get free civil legal help from Legal Aid of West Virginia.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I get the evictions undone because the place was uninhabitable?
Not the ones that are finished. Jaroush makes the warranty a defense that entitles a tenant to prove the allegations before being dispossessed in a pending case — not a way to reverse a completed eviction. If a case is still open or within an appeal window, that changes, so confirm the status with the court clerk.
Can I sue for the rent I already paid?
That is the claim that fits your situation. Under Teller, damages are measured by the difference between what the premises would have been worth as warranted and their fair rental value in the condition they were actually in, plus damages for annoyance and inconvenience you can prove. Your rent receipts and dated photos are what build it.
Could I have fixed the plumbing and taken it off the rent?
No — West Virginia does not allow repair-and-deduct, and Teller expressly declined to adopt that remedy. The route is notifying the landlord of the defect and then pursuing the warranty claim, not withholding or self-repairing, which can put a tenant in the wrong.